2027年7月29日周四

That in the actual state of tillage the bounty must necessarily have this tendency, will not, I apprehend, be disputed by any reasonable person. But it has been thought by many people, that it tends to encourage tillage, and that in two different ways; first, by opening a more extensive foreign market to the corn of the farmer, it tends, they imagine, to increase the demand for, and consequently the production of, that commodity; and, secondly by securing to him a better price than he could otherwise expect in the actual state of tillage, it tends, they suppose, to encourage tillage. This double encouragement must they imagine, in a long period of years, occasion such an increase in the production of corn, as may lower its price in the home market, much more than the bounty can raise it in the actual state which tillage may, at the end of that period, happen to be in.

出处： https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3300
Book IV, Chapter V, paragraph 1168

本条为原文直读：保留原文与出处，白话与上下文待后续补充。

汝今終日向外馳求，為名、為利，這都是為著軀殼外面的物事。汝若為著耳、目、口、鼻、四肢，要非禮勿視、聽、言、動時，豈是汝之耳、目、口、鼻、四肢自能勿視、聽、言、動？須由汝心。這視、聽、言、動皆是汝心，汝心之視，發竅於目；汝心之聽，發竅於耳；汝心之言，發竅於口；汝心之動，發竅於四肢。若無汝心，便無耳、目、口、鼻。所謂汝心，亦不專是那一團血肉；若是那一團血肉，如今已死的人，那一團血肉還在，緣何不能視、聽、言、動？所謂汝心，卻是那能視、聽、言、動的，這個便是性，便是天理。有這個性，才能生。這性之生理，便謂之仁。這性之生理：發在目，便會視；發在耳，便會聽；發在口，便會言；發在四肢，便會動；都只是那天理發生。以其主宰一身，故謂之心。這心之本體，原只是個天理，原無非禮，這個便是汝之真己，這個真己是軀殼的主宰。若無真己，便無軀殼；真是有之即生，無之即死。

出处： https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E5%82%B3%E7%BF%92%E9%8C%84/%E5%8D%B7%E4%B8%8A
卷上·第122条

本条为原文直读：保留原文与出处，白话与上下文待后续补充。

The Venetians, during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, carried on a very advantageous commerce in spiceries and other East India goods, which they distributed among the other nations of Europe. They purchased them chiefly in Egypt, at that time under the dominion of the Mamelukes, the enemies of the Turks, of whom the Venetians were the enemies; and this union of interest, assisted by the money of Venice, formed such a connexion as gave the Venetians almost a monopoly of the trade.

出处： https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3300
Book IV, Chapter VII, paragraph 1297

本条为原文直读：保留原文与出处，白话与上下文待后续补充。

魯欲使樂正子為政。孟子曰：「吾聞之，喜而不寐。」 公孫丑曰：「樂正子強乎？」 曰：「否。」「有知慮乎？」 曰：「否。」 「多聞識乎？」 曰：「否。」 「然則奚為喜而不寐。」 曰：「其為人也好善。」 「好善足乎？」 曰：「好善優於天下，而況魯國乎？夫茍好善，則四海之內，皆將輕千里而來告之以善。夫茍不好善，則人將曰：『訑訑，予既已知之矣。』訑訑之聲音顏色，距人於千里之外。士止於千里之外，則讒諂面諛之人至矣。與讒諂面諛之人居，國欲治，可得乎？」

出处： https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E5%AD%9F%E5%AD%90/%E5%91%8A%E5%AD%90%E4%B8%8B
告子下·13

本条为原文直读：保留原文与出处，白话与上下文待后续补充。

For years and years this early partner and I worked shoulder to shoulder; our desks were in the same room. We both lived on Euclid Avenue, a few rods apart. We met and walked to the office together, walked home to luncheon, back again after luncheon, and home again at night. On these walks, when we were away from the office interruptions, we did our thinking, talking, and planning together. Mr. Flagler drew practically all our contracts. He has always had the faculty of being able to clearly express the intent and purpose of a contract so well and accurately that there could be no misunderstanding, and his contracts were fair to both sides. I can remember his saying often that when you go into an arrangement you must measure up the rights and proprieties of both sides with the same yardstick, and this was the way Henry M. Flagler did.

出处： https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/17090
Chapter I, excerpt 15

本条为原文直读：保留原文与出处，白话与上下文待后续补充。