投资 · 创业者自述

塞缪尔·斯迈尔斯:节俭·摘录 404

塞缪尔·斯迈尔斯《节俭》· Thrift · 投资

Where would England have been now, but for the energy, enterprise, and public spirit of our manufacturers? Could agriculture have supported the continuous increase of population? Is it not more probable that this country would have become overrun by beggars,--or that property would have been assailed and the constitution upset, as was the case in France,--but for the extensive and remunerative employment afforded to the labouring classes in the manufacturing districts? The steam engine has indeed proved the safety-valve of England. It enabled the kingdom to hold its ground firmly during the continental wars; and but for it, and the industries which it has established, England would probably by this time have sunk to the condition of a third or fourth-rate power.

出处: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/14418
定位:Excerpt 404 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

如果没有制造商的干劲、进取心和公共精神,英国会怎样?农业能养活不断增长的人口吗?更可能的是,国家会被乞丐淹没,或者财产遭到攻击、宪法被推翻,就像法国那样——除非制造业地区为劳动阶级提供了大量有报酬的工作。蒸汽机确实是英国的安全阀。它让英国在大陆战争期间站稳脚跟;没有它和它建立的产业,英国恐怕早已沦为三四流国家。这说明,工业发展不仅创造财富,还通过就业缓解社会矛盾,维护政治稳定。

上下文

斯迈尔斯《节俭》中论述制造业对英国社会稳定的关键作用,背景是工业革命和拿破仑战争。

今日一问

今天的社会稳定是否也依赖充分的就业?我们该如何看待产业政策的社会意义?

公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库