投资 · 西方古典

弗雷德里克·巴斯夏:经济诡辩·摘录 224

弗雷德里克·巴斯夏《经济诡辩》· Economic Sophisms · 投资

Machinery, and the importation of foreign commodities, certainly produce effects. These effects may be good or bad; on that there may be difference of opinion. But whatever view we take of them, it is reduced to a formula, by one of these two principles: Machinery is a good; or, machinery is an evil: Importations of foreign produce are beneficial; or, such importations are hurtful. But to assert that there are no principles, certainly exhibits the lowest degree of abasement to which the human mind can descend; and I confess that I blush for my country when I hear such a monstrous heresy proclaimed in the French Chambers, and with their assent; that is to say, in the face and with the assent of the _élite_ of our fellow-citizens; and this in order to justify their imposing laws upon us in total ignorance of the real state of the case.

出处: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/44145
定位:Excerpt 224 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

机器和进口商品确实有影响,好坏可以争论,但总得有个原则:要么机器是好事,要么是坏事;要么进口有利,要么有害。最糟的是说根本没有原则,那等于放弃思考。巴斯夏说,听到法国议会里有人宣扬这种怪论还得到精英赞同,他替国家脸红,因为这些人就在对真实情况一无所知的情况下立法。所以,公共讨论必须回到原则,不能靠含糊其辞来蒙混过关。

上下文

巴斯夏批评法国议会中一些议员既承认影响又拒绝原则,却据此制定保护主义法律。

今日一问

你在讨论公共政策时,会要求对方亮出原则,还是接受含糊其辞?

公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库