投资 · 西方古典

弗雷德里克·巴斯夏:经济诡辩·摘录 325

弗雷德里克·巴斯夏《经济诡辩》· Economic Sophisms · 投资

Certain nations seem marvellously disposed to become the prey of government spoliation; those especially where the people, losing sight of their own dignity and their own energy, think themselves undone if they are not _governed and controlled_ in everything. Without having travelled very much, I have seen countries where it is believed that agriculture can make no progress unless experimental farms are maintained by the government; that there would soon be no horses but for the state _haras_; and that fathers of families would either not educate their children, or have them taught immorality, if the state did not prescribe the course of education, etc., etc. In such a country, revolutions succeed each other, and the governing powers are changed in rapid succession. But the governed continue nevertheless to be governed on the principle of mercy and compassion (for the tendency which I am here exposing is the very food upon which governments live), until at length the people perceive that it is better to leave the greatest possible number of services in the category of those which the parties interested exchange at _a price fixed by free and open bargaining_.

出处: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/44145
定位:Excerpt 325 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

有些民族似乎特别容易成为政府掠夺的猎物,尤其是那些人民丧失尊严和活力、认为一切都要被“管起来”才行的国家。我见过这样的地方:人们相信农业没有政府办的试验农场就不能进步,没有国营种马场就没有马,父亲不按国家规定的课程就教不好孩子。结果革命接连发生,政权频繁更迭,但被统治者仍被“仁慈”地统治着。直到人民终于明白:最好让尽可能多的服务由相关方在自由公开的议价中按价格交换。

上下文

巴斯夏在《经济诡辩》中批判法国等国家过度依赖政府干预的思维,认为这是政府掠夺的温床。

今日一问

你生活中哪些事本可以自由议价交换,却被习惯性地交给“上面”来管?

公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库