事业 · 创业者自述
爱德华·博克：爱德华·博克自传·补录 201
爱德华·博克《爱德华·博克自传》· The Americanization of Edward Bok · 领导
That evening Bok got at the papers in the case, and found out that, technically, Doctor Storrs was right: he had not written or signed such a statement. The compiler of the symposium, the editor of one of New York's leading evening papers whom Bok had employed, had found Doctor Storrs's declaration in favor of a clergyman's use of tobacco in an address made some time before, had extracted it and incorporated it into the symposium. It was, therefore, Doctor Storrs's opinion on the subject, but not written for the occasion for which it was used. Bok felt that his editor had led him into an indiscretion. Yet the sentiments were those of the writer whose name was attached to them, so that the act was not one of forgery. The editor explained that he had sent the extract to Doctor Storrs, who had not returned it, and he had taken silence to mean consent to the use of the material.
出处：
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3538
定位：Additional excerpt 201 · 核对日期：2026-10-19 · 核验：短摘录
白话
博克查证后发现，斯托尔斯确实没为这次专题写稿，但他的话被编辑从旧演讲中摘出，未经同意就用了。严格说，这不算伪造，因为观点确实是斯托尔斯的。但编辑擅自使用，让博克陷入尴尬。博克认为编辑行事不谨慎，但核心事实是：话是斯托尔斯说的，只是没经他授权用于此处。这提醒我们，引用他人观点必须获得明确许可，沉默不等于同意。
上下文
博克调查指控真相，发现是编辑擅自摘录旧言论所致。
今日一问
你引用他人观点时，是否确认过对方真的同意？
公版传记；原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg，仅摘录段落并附全书链接。
你的邮箱
只用于发送原典。不发广告，不卖名单。
本文本为公版；底本与原文链接见上。 版权