事业 · 创业者自述
爱德华·博克:爱德华·博克自传·补录 224
爱德华·博克《爱德华·博克自传》· The Americanization of Edward Bok · 领导
It is unnecessary to say to which of the two men Bok was the more attracted, and when it came, each quarter, to figuring how many articles could go into the Review without exceeding the cost limit fixed by the house, it was always a puzzle to Doctor Briggs why the majority of the articles left out were invariably those that he had brought in, while many of those which Doctor Patton handed in somehow found their place, upon the final assembling, among the contents.
出处:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3538
定位:Additional excerpt 224 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录
白话
博克更被两个人中的哪一个吸引,不必多说;而每季度要计算有多少文章能放进《评论》又不超出版社规定的成本上限时,布里格斯博士总是不明白:为什么被删掉的大多是他拿来的文章,而帕顿博士交上来的许多文章,最后组装时总能挤进目录。表面看是选稿标准问题,背后其实是人际信任和判断权的分配:谁更被团队接纳,谁的意见就更容易被采纳。要减少这种困惑,与其事后抱怨不公,不如提前把取舍标准摆到桌面上,让每篇文章的去留都有可核对依据。
上下文
博克在斯克里布纳出版社参与编辑事务,目睹两位编辑在选稿和成本控制上的微妙差异。
今日一问
你所在团队做取舍时,有没有把标准说清楚,还是靠谁更被信任来决定?
公版传记;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。
你的邮箱
只用于发送原典。不发广告,不卖名单。
本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权