事业 · 创业者自述
爱德华·博克:爱德华·博克自传·补录 485
爱德华·博克《爱德华·博克自传》· The Americanization of Edward Bok · 领导
But the author must also know when to let his material alone. In his excessive regard for style even so great a master as Robert Louis Stevenson robbed his work of much of the spontaneity and natural charm found, for example, in his Vailima Letters. The main thing is for a writer to say what he has to say in the best way, natural to himself, in which he can say it, and then let it alone--always remembering that, provided he has made himself clear, the message itself is of greater import than the manner in which it is said. Up to a certain point only is a piece of literary work an artistic endeavor. A readable, lucid style is far preferable to what is called a "literary style"--a foolish phrase, since it often means nothing except a complicated method of expression which confuses rather than clarifies thought. What the public wants in its literature is human nature, and that human nature simply and forcibly expressed. This is fundamental, and this is why true literature has no fashion and knows no change, despite the cries of the modern weaklings who affect weird forms. The clarity of Shakespeare is the clarity of to-day and will be that of to-morrow.
出处:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3538
定位:Additional excerpt 485 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录
白话
核心是:作者也要知道何时停手,不要过度修饰。斯蒂文森过度讲究风格,反而失去了自然魅力。关键是用最自然的方式把话讲清楚,然后放手。清晰比所谓的“文学风格”更重要,因为后者常意味着复杂难懂。公众要的是人性,简单有力地表达。可执行的做法是:写完初稿后,检查是否清晰,然后克制修改的冲动,保留自然感。
上下文
博克在自传中讨论写作风格,以斯蒂文森为例,强调清晰自然胜过刻意雕琢。
今日一问
你写作时是否曾过度修饰反而让意思模糊?如何判断何时该停手?
公版传记;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。
你的邮箱
只用于发送原典。不发广告,不卖名单。
本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权