塞缪尔·斯迈尔斯：节俭·摘录 251

Many persons object to Friendly Societies because they are conducted at public-houses; because many of them are got up by the keepers of public-houses in order to obtain custom from the members; and because, in their fortnightly meetings to pay their subscriptions, they acquire the pernicious habit of drinking, and thus waste quite as much as they save. The Friendly Societies doubtless rely very much on the social element. The public-house is everybody's house. The members can there meet together, talk together, and drink together. It is extremely probable that had they trusted solely to the sense of duty--the duty of insuring against sickness--and merely required the members to pay their weekly contributions to a collector, very few societies of the kind would have remained in existence. In a large number of cases, there is practically no choice between the society that meets at a public-house, and none at all.

出处： https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/14418
定位：Excerpt 251 · 核对日期：2026-10-19 · 核验：短摘录

公版作品；原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg，仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版；底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库