投资 · 西方古典

大卫·李嘉图:政治经济学及赋税原理·摘录 202

大卫·李嘉图《政治经济学及赋税原理》· On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation · 投资

A tax, however, on raw produce, and on the necessaries of the labourer, would have another effect--it would raise wages. From the effect of the principle of population on the increase of mankind, wages of the lowest kind never continue much above that rate which nature and habit demand for the support of the labourers. This class is never able to bear any considerable portion of taxation; and, consequently, if they had to pay 8_s._ per quarter in addition for wheat, and in some smaller proportion for other necessaries, they would not be able to subsist on the same wages as before, and to keep up the race of labourers. Wages would inevitably and necessarily rise; and in proportion as they rose, profits would fall. Government would receive a tax of 8_s._ per quarter on all the corn consumed in the country, a part of which would be paid directly by the consumers of corn; the other part would be paid indirectly by those who employed labour, and would affect profits in the same manner as if wages had been raised from the increased demand for labour compared with the supply, or from an increasing difficulty of obtaining the food and necessaries required by the labourer.

出处: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/33310
定位:Excerpt 202 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

对农产品和劳动者必需品征税还有另一个效果:它会提高工资。由于人口原理,最低工资始终只能维持劳动者基本生活。这个阶层无法承担重税,如果小麦每夸特多付8先令,其他必需品也涨价,他们靠原工资就活不下去,无法维持劳动力再生产。所以工资必然上涨,而工资上涨利润就会下降。政府收到的税,一部分由谷物消费者直接支付,另一部分由雇主间接支付,通过利润下降体现,就像劳动力需求增加或食物获取困难导致工资上涨一样。

上下文

李嘉图讨论对必需品征税的连锁反应,涉及工资、利润和人口原理。

今日一问

如果对生活必需品征税,为什么最终会降低利润?这对企业有什么影响?

公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库