投资 · 西方古典

大卫·李嘉图:政治经济学及赋税原理·摘录 226

大卫·李嘉图《政治经济学及赋税原理》· On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation · 投资

Dr. Smith's view of this subject is probably the reason why he has described "the tithe, and every other land-tax of this kind, under the appearance of perfect equality, as very unequal taxes; a certain portion of the produce being in different situations, equivalent to a very different portion of the rent." I have endeavoured to shew that such taxes do not fall with unequal weight on the different classes of farmers or landlords, as they are both compensated by the rise of raw produce, and only contribute to the tax in proportion as they are consumers of raw produce. Inasmuch indeed as wages, and through wages, the rate of profits are affected, landlords, instead of contributing their full share to such a tax, are the class peculiarly exempted. It is the profits of stock, from which that portion of the tax is derived which falls on those labourers, who from the insufficiency of their funds, are incapable of paying taxes; this portion is exclusively borne by all those whose income is derived from the employment of stock, and therefore it in no degree affects landlords.

出处: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/33310
定位:Excerpt 226 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

斯密认为什一税等土地税看似公平实则很不公平,因为同样比例的产品在不同情况下等于不同比例的地租。李嘉图则试图证明这类税对农民和地主阶级的负担并不不均,因为他们都通过原材料价格上涨得到补偿,只按消费原材料比例纳税。实际上,由于工资及利润受影响,地主反而特别豁免,承担了不足份额;部分税收来自资本利润,由雇佣资本者承担,不影响地主。

上下文

李嘉图在《政治经济学及赋税原理》中批评斯密对土地税公平性的看法,分析税收归宿。

今日一问

我们是否常误以为按比例征税就公平,而忽略了税收的实际归宿?

公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库