投资 · 西方古典
弗雷德里克·巴斯夏:经济诡辩·摘录 181
弗雷德里克·巴斯夏《经济诡辩》· Economic Sophisms · 投资
As regarded his workmen, they had no more employment than formerly. There were five times more fields, but each field was five times smaller; they produced oil, but they produced less wheat; he no longer purchased linens, but he no longer sold rye. Moreover, the farmer could expend in wages only the amount of his capital, and his capital went on constantly diminishing. A great part of it went for buildings, and the various implements needed for the more varied cultivation in which he had engaged. In short, the supply of labour remained the same, but as the means of remunerating that labour fell off, the ultimate result was a forcible reduction of wages.
出处:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/44145
定位:Excerpt 181 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录
白话
农夫的雇工并没有因为多种经营而获得更多工作。田地分成更多块,每块更小,产量下降;他不再买亚麻布,也不再卖黑麦。资本大量投入建筑和多样化的农具,导致用于支付工资的流动资本减少。最终,劳动力供给没变,但用来支付工资的钱少了,工资被压低。核心是:自给自足会挤占流动资本,减少雇佣能力。做法是:保护用于工资的流动资本,避免过度投资于低效的固定设施。
上下文
巴斯夏继续分析农夫的例子,指出自给自足会减少工资基金,损害工人利益。
今日一问
你的资金是否过多沉淀在低效资产上,而挤占了日常运营的现金?
公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。
你的邮箱
只用于发送原典。不发广告,不卖名单。
本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权