投资 · 西方古典
弗雷德里克·巴斯夏:经济诡辩·摘录 68
弗雷德里克·巴斯夏《经济诡辩》· Economic Sophisms · 投资
You see very clearly, then, that nature, or rather that Providence, more wise, more far-seeing than your narrow and rigid theory supposes, has not ordered this concentration of industry, this monopoly of all advantages upon which you found your reasoning as upon a fact which is unalterable and without remedy. Nature has provided, by means as simple as they are infallible, that there should be dispersion, diffusion, solidarity, simultaneous progress; all constituting a state of things which your restrictive laws paralyze as much as they can; for the tendency of such laws is, by isolating communities, to render the diversity of condition much more marked, to prevent equalization, hinder fusion, neutralize countervailing circumstances, and segregate nations, whether in their superiority or in their inferiority of condition.
出处:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/44145
定位:Excerpt 68 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录
白话
巴斯夏指出,自然(或天意)比保护主义者狭隘的理论更智慧,它没有让产业永久集中或垄断。相反,自然用简单而可靠的方式促成分散、扩散、团结和共同进步。而限制性法律却尽力阻碍这种趋势,它隔离社群,使条件差异更明显,阻止均等化,妨碍融合,抵消平衡因素,让国家之间要么优越要么低劣地彼此隔绝。所以,保护主义看似保护,实则固化差距,阻碍共同繁荣。
上下文
巴斯夏在《经济诡辩》中批判保护主义法律,认为它们违背自然的经济分散趋势。
今日一问
我们制定的某些政策,是否也在无意中隔离群体、固化差距?
公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。
你的邮箱
只用于发送原典。不发广告,不卖名单。
本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权