投资 · 西方古典

弗雷德里克·巴斯夏:经济诡辩·摘录 87

弗雷德里克·巴斯夏《经济诡辩》· Economic Sophisms · 投资

We do not pay for the air we breathe, although it is so _useful_ to us, that, without it, we could not live two minutes. We do not pay for it, nevertheless; because nature furnishes it to us without the aid of human labour. But if, for example, we should desire to separate one of the gases of which it is composed, to make an experiment, we must make an exertion; or if we wish another to make that exertion for us, we must sacrifice for that other an equivalent amount of exertion, although we may have embodied it in another product. Whence we see that pains, efforts, and exertions are the real subjects of exchange. It is not, indeed, the oxygen gas that I pay for, since it is at my disposal everywhere, but the labour necessary to disengage it, labour which has been saved me, and which must be recompensed. Will it be said that there is something else to be paid for, materials, apparatus, etc.? Still, in paying for these, I pay for labour. The price of the coal employed, for example, represents the labour necessary to extract it from the mine and to transport it to the place where it is to be used.

出处: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/44145
定位:Excerpt 87 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

我们不付钱呼吸空气,因为自然免费提供,不需要劳动。但如果你想分离出空气中的某种气体做实验,就得付出努力;或者请别人做,就得用等价的东西补偿他的劳动。所以交换的真正对象是辛苦、努力和劳动,不是氧气本身。即使你付钱买煤、买设备,那些价格里也主要是开采、运输、制造所花的劳动。这个道理能帮你看清价格:任何商品的价格,拆到底都是人的劳动。对今天的人来说,理解这一点,就能不被“材料本身值钱”的说法迷惑,而去看背后的人力成本。

上下文

巴斯夏用空气和氧气的例子,说明交换的实质是劳动,而不是物的自然属性。

今日一问

下次你觉得某样东西“本来就该贵”时,能不能拆开看看里面有多少是人的劳动?

公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库