投资 · 西方古典
托斯丹·凡勃伦:有闲阶级论·摘录 152
托斯丹·凡勃伦《有闲阶级论》· The Theory of the Leisure Class · 投资
So far, nothing has been said of the Maecenas function of the well-to-do, which is habitually dwelt on at some length by writers and speakers who treat of the development of culture and of social structure. This leisure-class function is not without an important bearing on the higher and on the spread of knowledge and culture. The manner and the degree in which the class furthers learning through patronage of this kind is sufficiently familiar. It has been frequently presented in affectionate and effective terms by spokesmen whose familiarity with the topic fits them to bring home to their hearers the profound significance of this cultural factor. These spokesmen, however, have presented the matter from the point of view of the cultural interest, or of the interest of reputability, rather than from that of the economic interest. As apprehended from the economic point of view, and valued for the purpose of industrial serviceability, this function of the well-to-do, as well as the intellectual attitude of members of the well-to-do class, merits some attention and will bear illustration.
出处:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/833
定位:Excerpt 152 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录
白话
有钱人资助学术和艺术,常被说成是文化贡献,但凡勃伦提醒,这种“赞助人”功能要从经济角度看。富人赞助学问,往往是为了博取声誉,而不是提升工业效率。他们支持的多是古典人文,对社区的生产力帮助不大。所以,评价一笔赞助是否真有价值,不能只看它是否风雅,要看它是否促进了实用知识。今天企业或富豪捐资办学,也该问:这笔钱是装点门面,还是真能推动社会进步?
上下文
凡勃伦分析有闲阶级的“梅塞纳斯”功能,即富人赞助文化,认为这更多是身份竞争。
今日一问
你身边有没有“赞助”其实是为了名声而非实效的例子?
公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。
你的邮箱
只用于发送原典。不发广告,不卖名单。
本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权