投资 · 西方古典
托斯丹·凡勃伦:有闲阶级论·摘录 59
托斯丹·凡勃伦《有闲阶级论》· The Theory of the Leisure Class · 投资
In the latter case the sanctuary and the sacred apparatus are so contrived as not to enhance the comfort or fullness of life of the vicarious consumer, or at any rate not to convey the impression that the end of their consumption is the consumer's comfort. For the end of vicarious consumption is to enhance, not the fullness of life of the consumer, but the pecuniary repute of the master for whose behoof the consumption takes place. Therefore priestly vestments are notoriously expensive, ornate, and inconvenient; and in the cults where the priestly servitor of the divinity is not conceived to serve him in the capacity of consort, they are of an austere, comfortless fashion. And such it is felt that they should be.
出处:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/833
定位:Excerpt 59 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录
白话
在代理消费的情况下,圣所和圣器被设计得不会增加代理消费者的舒适或生活丰盈,至少不让人以为消费目的是为了消费者的舒服。因为代理消费的目的不是让消费者过得好,而是提高背后主人的金钱声望。所以祭司的法衣出了名地昂贵、华丽又不方便;在祭司不被看作神之配偶的 cults 里,法衣还特别简朴、不舒服。而且人们觉得本来就该这样。
上下文
凡勃伦《有闲阶级论》继续分析宗教代理消费,指出圣器法衣的昂贵和不便正是为了彰显神的荣耀。
今日一问
你工作中有没有为了“显得专业”而故意保留的不方便?
公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。
你的邮箱
只用于发送原典。不发广告,不卖名单。
本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权