投资 · 西方古典

托斯丹·凡勃伦:有闲阶级论·摘录 66

托斯丹·凡勃伦《有闲阶级论》· The Theory of the Leisure Class · 投资

Today a divergence in ideals is beginning to be apparent. The portion of the leisure class that has been consistently exempt from work and from pecuniary cares for a generation or more is now large enough to form and sustain opinion in matters of taste. Increased mobility of the members has also added to the facility with which a "social confirmation" can be attained within the class. Within this select class the exemption from thrift is a matter so commonplace as to have lost much of its utility as a basis of pecuniary decency. Therefore the latter-day upper-class canons of taste do not so consistently insist on an unremitting demonstration of expensiveness and a strict exclusion of the appearance of thrift. So, a predilection for the rustic and the "natural" in parks and grounds makes its appearance on these higher social and intellectual levels. This predilection is in large part an outcropping of the instinct of workmanship; and it works out its results with varying degrees of consistency. It is seldom altogether unaffected, and at times it shades off into something not widely different from that make-believe of rusticity which has been referred to above.

出处: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/833
定位:Excerpt 66 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

凡勃伦观察到,如今有闲阶级内部开始出现审美分化。一部分人已经连续几代不工作、不愁钱,人数多到能形成并维持品味舆论,加上社交流动便利,他们不再需要时刻炫耀浪费来证明体面。于是,这个上层圈子开始偏爱公园和庭院里的“乡野”“自然”风格。这种偏好部分源于工艺本能,但也不完全纯粹,有时会滑向一种假装出来的乡野趣味。

上下文

凡勃伦描述有闲阶级内部审美分化,部分上层人士开始偏爱“自然”风格,但未必纯粹。

今日一问

你追求的“自然”“质朴”生活,是真心喜欢,还是在模仿某种阶层品味?

公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库