投资 · 西方古典
托斯丹·凡勃伦:有闲阶级论·摘录 96
托斯丹·凡勃伦《有闲阶级论》· The Theory of the Leisure Class · 投资
To adapt the classical terminology, they are institutions of acquisition or of production; or to revert to terms already employed in a different connection in earlier chapters, they are pecuniary or industrial institutions; or in still other terms, they are institutions serving either the invidious or the non-invidious economic interest. The former category have to do with "business," the latter with industry, taking the latter word in the mechanical sense. The latter class are not often recognized as institutions, in great part because they do not immediately concern the ruling class, and are, therefore, seldom the subject of legislation or of deliberate convention. When they do receive attention they are commonly approached from the pecuniary or business side; that being the side or phase of economic life that chiefly occupies men's deliberations in our time, especially the deliberations of the upper classes. These classes have little else than a business interest in things economic, and on them at the same time it is chiefly incumbent to deliberate upon the community's affairs.
出处:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/833
定位:Excerpt 96 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录
白话
用古典术语说,制度可分为获取型或生产型;用前几章的术语,是金钱制度或工业制度;或者说是服务于歧视性利益或非歧视性经济利益。前者关乎“生意”,后者关乎工业(机械意义上的)。后者很少被当作制度,因为它们不直接涉及统治阶级,所以很少成为立法或自觉约定的对象。即使受到关注,也常从金钱或生意角度处理,因为这是当今人们(尤其是上层)思考经济生活的主要角度。这些阶级对经济事务只有生意兴趣,却主要负责审议社区事务。
上下文
凡勃伦区分金钱制度与工业制度,批判上层阶级以生意视角主导公共事务。
今日一问
今天哪些公共决策被“生意逻辑”主导,而忽略了工业或民生逻辑?
公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。
你的邮箱
只用于发送原典。不发广告,不卖名单。
本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权