霍华德·马克斯：再谈风险·第13则

“Value at Risk” was supposed to tell the banks how much they could lose on a very bad day. During the crisis, however, VaR was often shown to have understated the risk, since the assumptions hadn’t been harsh enough. Given the fact that risk managers are required at banks and de rigueur elsewhere, I think more money was spent on risk management in the early 2000s than in the rest of history combined . . . and yet we experienced the worst financial crisis in 80 years. Investors can calculate risk metrics like VaR and Sharpe ratios (we use them at Oaktree; they’re the best tools we have), but they shouldn’t put too much faith in them.

出处： https://www.oaktreecapital.com/docs/default-source/memos/2015-06-08-risk-revisited-again.pdf
定位：Memo, excerpt 13 · 核对日期：2026-10-19 · 核验：短摘录

版权仍存续；仅摘录并链接橡树资本官网原文，不托管全文。

本文本版权仍存续，此处仅为短摘录；完整原文请访问上方官方链接。 版权

← 返回原文库