Day 86 · Tue, Jan 12, 2027 · Five editions

Tue, Jan 12, 2027

Five emails a day: 00:00 Night / 07:00 Morning / 12:00 Noon / 17:00 Evening / 21:00 Figures

00:00 Night · Health · Chinese classics

王阳明:Chuanxilu, 卷下 211

王阳明《傳習錄》· 卷下·第211条 · Health · Cognition · Decision · Philosophy

先生問九川:「於『致知』之說體驗如何?」 九川曰:「自覺不同。往時操持常不得個恰好處,此乃是恰好處。」 先生曰:「可知是體來與聽講不同。我初與講時,知爾只是忽易,未有滋味。只這個要妙再體到深處,日見不同,是無窮盡的。」又曰:「此『致知』二字,真是個千古聖傳之秘,見到這裏,『百世以俟聖人而不惑』。」

Source: https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E5%82%B3%E7%BF%92%E9%8C%84/%E5%8D%B7%E4%B8%8B
卷下·第211条

This is a direct reading: the original and source are kept; commentary will be added later.

Today's question

What does this passage say about your body or mood today?

07:00 Morning · Health · Chinese classics

王阳明:Chuanxilu, 卷上 6

王阳明《傳習錄》· 卷上·第6条 · Health · Cognition · Learning · Decision

愛問:「昨聞先生『止至善』之教,已覺功夫有用力處。但與朱子『格物』之訓,思之終不能合。」 先生曰:「『格物』是『止至善』之功,既知『至善』,即知『格物』矣。」 愛曰:「昨以先生之教推之『格物』之說,似亦見得大略。但朱子之訓,其於《書》之『精一』,《論語》之『博約』,《孟子》之『盡心知性』,皆有所證據,以是未能釋然。」 先生曰:「子夏篤信聖人,曾子反求諸己。篤信固亦是,然不如反求之切。今既不得於心,安可狃於舊聞,不求是當?就如朱子亦尊信程子,至其不得於心處,亦何嘗茍從?『精一』、『博約』、『盡心』本自與吾說吻合,但未之思耳。朱子『格物』之訓,未免牽合附會,非其本旨。精是一之功,博是約之功,曰仁既明知行合一之說,此可一言而喻。『盡心、知性、知天』是『生知安行』事,『存心、養性、事天』是『學知利行』事,『夭壽不貳,修身以俟』是『困知勉行』事。

Source: https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E5%82%B3%E7%BF%92%E9%8C%84/%E5%8D%B7%E4%B8%8A
卷上·第6条

This is a direct reading: the original and source are kept; commentary will be added later.

Today's question

What does this passage say about your body or mood today?

12:00 Noon · Investing · Modern investor letters

Warren Buffett:Berkshire 1985 Letter, Excerpt 1

Warren Buffett《Berkshire Hathaway 1985 Letter to Shareholders》· 1985 Chairman's Letter · Investing

You may remember the wildly upbeat message of last year’s report: nothing much was in the works but our experience had been that something big popped up occasionally. This carefully- crafted corporate strategy paid off in 1985. Later sections of this report discuss (a) our purchase of a major position in Capital Cities/ABC, (b) our acquisition of Scott & Fetzer, (c) our entry into a large, extended term participation in the insurance business of Fireman’s Fund, and (d) our sale of our stock in General Foods.

Source: https://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/1985.html
1985 Chairman's Letter, excerpt 1

This is a direct reading: the original and source are kept; commentary will be added later.

Today's question

Does this passage change one judgment about money or risk today?

17:00 Evening · Career · Chinese classics

子思:中庸, Section 16

子思《禮記·中庸》· 第16章 · Leadership · Philosophy · Action · Human nature

百世以俟聖人而不惑,知人也。是故君子動而世爲天下道,行而世爲天下法,言而世爲天下則。遠之則有望,近之則不厭。詩曰:『在彼無惡,在此無射。庶幾夙夜,以永終譽。』君子未有不如此而蚤有譽於天下者也。」仲尼祖述堯舜,憲章文武,上律天時,下襲水土。譬如天地之無不持載,無不覆幬,譬如四時之錯行,如日月之代明。萬物並育而不相害,道並行而不相悖。小德川流,大德敦化,此天地之所以爲大也。唯天下至聖,爲能聰明叡知,足以有臨也;寬裕温柔,足以有容也;發強剛毅,足以有執也;齊莊中正,足以有敬也;文理密察,足以有别也。溥博淵泉,而時出之。

Source: https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E7%A6%AE%E8%A8%98/%E4%B8%AD%E5%BA%B8
第16章

This is a direct reading: the original and source are kept; commentary will be added later.

Today's question

What does this passage say about how you work today?

21:00 Figures · Career · Entrepreneur memoirs

Steve Jobs:Connecting the Dots

Steve Jobs《Stanford University Commencement Address (2005)》· “Connecting the Dots” · Learning · Philosophy · Action

You can only connect them looking backward, so you have to trust that the dots will somehow connect in your future.

Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20241227014258/https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2005/06/steve-jobs-2005-graduates-stay-hungry-stay-foolish
Commencement address, passage on connecting the dots, as quoted by Stanford Report

Reading

The dots of life connect only in hindsight, so trust is required in advance.

Context

Steve Jobs (1955–2011) co-founded Apple in 1976, was forced out in 1985, and returned in 1997 to rebuild it around a focused product line. In his 2005 Stanford commencement address he recalled dropping out, taking a calligraphy class, and later using that experience in the Mac's typography. His point was that past experiences can only be connected in hindsight, so one must trust that they will eventually cohere.

Today's question

Which past failure now looks, in retrospect, like a necessary dot?