投资 · 创业者自述
塞缪尔·斯迈尔斯:节俭·摘录 248
塞缪尔·斯迈尔斯《节俭》· Thrift · 投资
English benefit societies, notwithstanding their great uses and benefits, have numerous defects. There are faults in the details of their organization and management, whilst many of them are financially unsound. Like other institutions in their early stages, they have been tentative and in a great measure empirical,--more especially as regards their rates of contribution and allowances for sick relief. The rates have in many cases been fixed too low, in proportion to the benefits allowed; and hence the "box" is often declared to be closed, after the money subscribed has been expended. The society then comes to an end, and the older members have to go without relief for the rest of their lives. But life assurance societies themselves have had to undergo the same discipline of failure, and the operation of "winding up" has not unfrequently thrown discredit upon these middle-class associations.
出处:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/14418
定位:Excerpt 248 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录
白话
英国互助会虽然用处很大,毛病也不少。组织管理细节有缺陷,很多会财务上不稳健。像其他早期机构一样,它们多是试探性的、凭经验办事,尤其在缴费标准和病假补贴上。很多会缴费定得太低,与福利不成比例,结果钱花完了,箱子就关了,协会倒闭,老会员后半辈子没了救济。不过,人寿保险公司也经历过同样的失败教训,清盘的事也常让中产阶级的协会丢脸。所以,问题不在互助本身,而在精算和管理。要办得长久,就得按风险定缴费,留足储备,不能只顾眼前。
上下文
斯迈尔斯在《节俭》中讨论互助会的缺陷,当时英国互助会运动蓬勃发展,但许多因管理不善而倒闭。
今日一问
你参与过的小型互助或储蓄计划,有没有算过长期风险?
公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。
你的邮箱
只用于发送原典。不发广告,不卖名单。
本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权