投资 · 西方古典
大卫·李嘉图：政治经济学及赋税原理·摘录 14
大卫·李嘉图《政治经济学及赋税原理》· On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation · 投资
It will be seen by the extract which I have made in page 4, from the "Wealth of Nations," that though Adam Smith fully recognized the principle, that the proportion between the quantities of labour necessary for acquiring different objects, is the only circumstance which can afford any rule for our exchanging them for one another, yet he limits its application to "that early and rude state of society, which precedes both the accumulation of stock and the appropriation of land;" as if, when profits and rent were to be paid, they would have some influence on the relative value of commodities, independent of the mere quantity of labour that was necessary to their production.
出处：
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/33310
定位：Excerpt 14 · 核对日期：2026-10-19 · 核验：短摘录
白话
李嘉图引用《国富论》指出，亚当·斯密虽然承认不同物品所需劳动量的比例是交换的唯一规则，但他把这一规则只限于“资本积累和土地占有之前的早期野蛮社会”。斯密似乎认为，一旦要支付利润和地租，它们就会独立于劳动量而影响商品的相对价值。李嘉图不认同这种限制，他认为需要进一步分析资本积累和土地占有对相对价值的影响，而不是简单地把劳动价值论局限在早期社会。
上下文
李嘉图在《政治经济学及赋税原理》中批评亚当·斯密，认为斯密没有彻底分析资本积累和地租对相对价值的影响。
今日一问
当一种理论在简单条件下成立，你是否会追问它在复杂现实（如资本、地租出现后）是否依然有效？
公版作品；原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg，仅摘录段落并附全书链接。
你的邮箱
只用于发送原典。不发广告，不卖名单。
本文本为公版；底本与原文链接见上。 版权