投资 · 西方古典
大卫·李嘉图:政治经济学及赋税原理·摘录 303
大卫·李嘉图《政治经济学及赋税原理》· On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation · 投资
It may be said then of two countries possessing precisely the same quantity of all the necessaries and comforts of life, that they are equally rich, but the value of their respective riches would depend on the comparative facility or difficulty with which they were produced. For if an improved piece of machinery should enable us to make two pair of stockings, instead of one, without additional labour, double the quantity would be given in exchange for a yard of cloth. If a similar improvement be made in the manufacture of cloth, stockings and cloth will exchange in the same proportions as before, but they will both have fallen in value; for in exchanging them for hats, for gold, or other commodities in general, twice the former quantity must be given. Extend the improvement to the production of gold, and every other commodity; and they will all regain their former proportions. There will be double the quantity of commodities annually produced in the country, and therefore the wealth of the country will be doubled, but this wealth will not have increased in value.
出处:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/33310
定位:Excerpt 303 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录
白话
两个国家如果拥有的生活必需品和舒适品数量完全一样,可以说它们一样富。但它们的财富价值,取决于生产这些东西的难易程度。如果机器改进,用同样劳动能生产两倍袜子,那么一码布能换到的袜子就翻倍。如果布的生产也改进,袜子和布又按原比例交换,但两者价值都下降了,因为换帽子、黄金等要花更多数量。如果黄金生产也改进,所有商品又恢复原比例。结果全国商品数量翻倍,财富翻倍,但价值没增加。这说明财富是实物数量,价值是交换比例,两者不是一回事。
上下文
李嘉图用袜子、布和黄金的例子,说明技术进步增加财富数量,却可能降低单位商品的价值。
今日一问
你更关注自己拥有的东西数量变多,还是它们更值钱?两者冲突时你怎么选?
公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。
你的邮箱
只用于发送原典。不发广告,不卖名单。
本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权