投资 · 西方古典
大卫·李嘉图:政治经济学及赋税原理·摘录 340
大卫·李嘉图《政治经济学及赋税原理》· On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation · 投资
In considering this question, we have purposely left out of our consideration the effect of such a measure on foreign trade; we have rather been supposing the case of an insulated country, having no commercial connexion with other countries. We have seen that as the demand of the country for corn and commodities would be the same, whatever direction the bounty might take, there would be no temptation to remove capital from one employment to another: but this would no longer be the case if there were foreign commerce, and that commerce were free. By altering the relative value of commodities and corn, by producing so powerful an effect on their natural prices, we should be applying a strong stimulus to the exportation of those commodities whose natural prices were lowered, and an equal stimulus to the importation of those commodities whose natural prices were raised, and thus such a financial measure might entirely alter the natural distribution of employments; to the advantage indeed of the foreign countries, but ruinously to that in which so absurd a policy was adopted.
出处:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/33310
定位:Excerpt 340 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录
白话
讨论这个问题时,我们故意不考虑对外贸易的影响,而是假设一个与别国没有贸易往来的封闭国家。我们看到,无论补贴指向哪里,国家对谷物和工业品的需求都一样,所以资本不会从一个行业转移到另一个行业。但如果存在自由贸易,情况就不同了。改变商品和谷物的相对价值,会强烈刺激自然价格降低的商品出口,同样刺激自然价格升高的商品进口,从而完全改变自然的行业分布。这对外国有利,对实行这种荒谬政策的国家却是毁灭性的。
上下文
李嘉图在《政治经济学及赋税原理》中先假设封闭经济,再引入对外贸易分析。
今日一问
你所在的组织或国家,是否因为干预价格而扭曲了资源在行业间的自然配置?
公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。
你的邮箱
只用于发送原典。不发广告,不卖名单。
本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权