投资 · 西方古典

托马斯·马尔萨斯:人口论·摘录 115

托马斯·马尔萨斯《人口论》· An Essay on the Principle of Population · 投资

It might be urged perhaps by some objectors that, as the fertility of the land increased, and various accidents occurred, the share of some men might be much more than sufficient for their support, and that when the reign of self-love was once established, they would not distribute their surplus produce without some compensation in return. It would be observed, in answer, that this was an inconvenience greatly to be lamented; but that it was an evil which bore no comparison to the black train of distresses that would inevitably be occasioned by the insecurity of property; that the quantity of food which one man could consume was necessarily limited by the narrow capacity of the human stomach; that it was not certainly probable that he should throw away the rest; but that even if he exchanged his surplus food for the labour of others, and made them in some degree dependent on him, this would still be better than that these others should absolutely starve.

出处: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/4239
定位:Excerpt 115 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

有人可能会反驳:土地肥力提高、偶然事件发生后,某些人分到的份额可能远超所需;一旦自爱之心确立,他们不会白白把余粮分给别人,总要换点回报。马尔萨斯回应说,这确实是个遗憾的麻烦,但比起财产不安全带来的种种苦难,简直不值一提。一个人能吃多少,受胃容量限制;他不太可能把余粮扔掉。就算他拿余粮换别人的劳动,让别人在某种程度上依赖他,那也总比让那些人活活饿死要好得多。

上下文

马尔萨斯在《人口论》中讨论财产权和不平等的起源。他承认不平等有弊端,但认为比起无政府状态下的普遍苦难,它仍是更优选择。

今日一问

当效率与公平冲突时,我们是否愿意接受某种程度的不平等,来换取基本秩序和更多人的生存?

公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库