投资 · 西方古典
弗雷德里克·巴斯夏:经济诡辩·摘录 154
弗雷德里克·巴斯夏《经济诡辩》· Economic Sophisms · 投资
At the end of some centuries, knowledge having in the interim made great progress, the common sense of Puera enabled her to see that such reciprocal obstacles could only be reciprocally hurtful. She therefore sent a diplomatist to Stulta, who, laying aside official phraseology, spoke to this effect: "We have made a highway, and now we throw obstacles in the way of using it. This is absurd. It would have been better to have left things as they were. We should not, in that case, have had to pay for making the road in the first place, nor afterwards have incurred the expense of maintaining _obstructives_. In the name of Puera, I come to propose to you, not to give up opposing each other all at once--that would be to act upon a principle, and we despise principles as much as you do--but to lessen somewhat the present obstacles, taking care to estimate equitably the respective _sacrifices_ we make for this purpose." So spoke the diplomatist. Stulta asked for time to consider the proposal, and proceeded to consult, in succession, her manufacturers and agriculturists. At length, after the lapse of some years, she declared that the negotiations were broken off.
出处:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/44145
定位:Excerpt 154 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录
白话
过了几百年,知识大进,普埃拉凭常识看出:这种互相设障只会互相伤害。于是它派外交官去斯图尔塔,撇开官话,直说:“我们修了路,却又在路上设障碍,这太荒唐。早知如此,不如不修。那样既不用花修路钱,也不用养设障队。我代表普埃拉提议:不是一下子全取消——那等于讲原则,而我们和你们一样看不起原则——而是先减少一些现有障碍,同时公平估算我们各自为此作出的‘牺牲’。”斯图尔塔说要考虑,先后咨询了制造商和农场主,几年后宣布谈判破裂。巴斯夏讽刺:明知荒谬,却因既得利益集团阻挠,连逐步减障都谈不成。
上下文
巴斯夏在《经济诡辩》中续写寓言,讽刺即使认识到保护关税有害,既得利益者仍会阻挠改革,连逐步削减都难以实现。
今日一问
你身边有没有明知该改、却因既得利益阻挠而改不动的事?
公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。
你的邮箱
只用于发送原典。不发广告,不卖名单。
本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权