投资 · 西方古典

弗雷德里克·巴斯夏:经济诡辩·摘录 48

弗雷德里克·巴斯夏《经济诡辩》· Economic Sophisms · 投资

But M. d'Argout tells us there is death where we think we perceive life, and that the importance of any branch of industry is in direct proportion to its powerlessness. What are we to expect, for instance, from the cultivation of beet-root? Do you not see that 48,000 _hectares_ of land, with capital and manual labour in proportion, are sufficient to supply all France with sugar? Then, this is a branch of industry of limited utility; limited, of course, with reference to the amount of labour which it demands, the only way in which, according to the ex-Minister, any branch of industry can be useful. This utility would be still more limited, if, owing to the fertility of the soil, and the richness of the beet-root, we could reap from 24,000 hectares, what at present we only obtain from 48,000. Oh! were only twenty times, a hundred times, more land, capital, and labour necessary to _yield us the same result_, so much the better. We might build some hopes on this new branch of industry, and it would be worthy of state protection, for it would offer a vast field to our national industry. But to produce much with little! that is a bad example, and it is time for the law to interfere.

出处: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/44145
定位:Excerpt 48 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

达尔古先生告诉人们:我们以为看到生机的地方,其实藏着死亡;一个行业的重要性,跟它有多无能成正比。他举例说,种甜菜只要四万八千公顷土地,加上相应资本和人工,就能供应全法国的糖。于是他说,这个行业效用有限——因为按这位前部长的标准,一个行业只有需要大量劳动才算有用。巴斯夏反讽道:要是因为土地肥沃、甜菜含糖高,两万四千公顷就够用,那效用就更“有限”了。天哪!要是需要二十倍、一百倍的土地、资本和劳动才能得到同样结果,那才更好呢!那样才值得国家保护,因为能给国民工业提供广阔天地。可“用很少产出很多”却成了坏榜样,法律该来干涉了。

上下文

达尔古曾任法国大臣,主张保护甜菜糖业。巴斯夏在《经济诡辩》中反驳这种以劳动量衡量价值的重商主义思路。

今日一问

如果一项技术让同样产出只需更少人力,你会为省下的资源高兴,还是为消失的岗位焦虑?

公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库