投资 · 西方古典

托斯丹·凡勃伦:有闲阶级论·摘录 143

托斯丹·凡勃伦《有闲阶级论》· The Theory of the Leisure Class · 投资

In the later and farther development of the pecuniary culture, the requirement of withdrawal from the industrial process in order to avoid social odium is carried so far as to comprise abstention from the emulative employments. At this advanced stage the pecuniary culture negatively favors the assertion of the non-invidious propensities by relaxing the stress laid on the merit of emulative, predatory, or pecuniary occupations, as compared with those of an industrial or productive kind. As was noticed above, the requirement of such withdrawal from all employment that is of human use applies more rigorously to the upper-class women than to any other class, unless the priesthood of certain cults might be cited as an exception, perhaps more apparent than real, to this rule. The reason for the more extreme insistence on a futile life for this class of women than for the men of the same pecuniary and social grade lies in their being not only an upper-grade leisure class but also at the same time a vicarious leisure class. There is in their case a double ground for a consistent withdrawal from useful effort.

出处: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/833
定位:Excerpt 143 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

在金钱文化发展得更晚更远的阶段,为了避免社会非议而要求退出工业过程,已经扩大到连攀比性职业也要回避。到了这个高级阶段,金钱文化反而在松动用攀比、掠夺或金钱职业来压过工业或生产性职业的压力,从而在反面有利于非攀比倾向的抬头。前面提过,要求退出一切对人类有用工作的规矩,对上流妇女比对任何其他阶层都更严格,某些教派的神职人员也许是例外,但多半只是表面例外。为什么对这类妇女比对同等级男人更极端地要求过无用生活?因为她们不仅是上等有闲阶级,同时还是“代理有闲”阶级,有双重理由一致地退出有用劳动。

上下文

凡勃伦《有闲阶级论》分析上流妇女为何被要求过“无用”生活,提出“代理有闲”概念。

今日一问

今天有哪些“体面”要求,实际上是在要求人做无用的事?

公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库