投资 · 西方古典

托斯丹·凡勃伦:有闲阶级论·摘录 159

托斯丹·凡勃伦《有闲阶级论》· The Theory of the Leisure Class · 投资

It is true, since conspicuous consumption has gained more and more on conspicuous leisure as a means of repute, the acquisition of the dead languages is no longer so imperative a requirement as it once was, and its talismanic virtue as a voucher of scholarship has suffered a concomitant impairment. But while this is true, it is also true that the classics have scarcely lost in absolute value as a voucher of scholastic respectability, since for this purpose it is only necessary that the scholar should be able to put in evidence some learning which is conventionally recognized as evidence of wasted time; and the classics lend themselves with great facility to this use. Indeed, there can be little doubt that it is their utility as evidence of wasted time and effort, and hence of the pecuniary strength necessary in order to afford this waste, that has secured to the classics their position of prerogative in the scheme of higher learning, and has led to their being esteemed the most honorific of all learning. They serve the decorative ends of leisure-class learning better than any other body of knowledge, and hence they are an effective means of reputability.

出处: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/833
定位:Excerpt 159 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

凡勃伦说,随着炫耀性消费比炫耀性有闲更受看重,学古典语言不再像过去那样是硬性要求,其“护身符”效力有所减弱。但古典学在证明学术体面方面的绝对价值几乎没降,因为只要展示出被公认“浪费过时间”的学问就行,而古典学最方便充当这种证据。实际上,正是因为它能证明浪费了时间和金钱,才在高等教育中占据特权地位,被视为最荣耀的学问。它最适合有闲阶级教育的装饰目的,因此是有效的声望手段。

上下文

凡勃伦分析古典学在高等教育中的特权地位,认为其根源在于能证明浪费。

今日一问

如果一门学问不能证明你“浪费”过时间,你还会觉得它体面吗?

公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库