投资 · 西方古典

托斯丹·凡勃伦:有闲阶级论·摘录 40

托斯丹·凡勃伦《有闲阶级论》· The Theory of the Leisure Class · 投资

In all grades and walks of life, and at any stage of the economic development, the leisure of the lady and of the lackey differs from the leisure of the gentleman in his own right in that it is an occupation of an ostensibly laborious kind. It takes the form, in large measure, of a painstaking attention to the service of the master, or to the maintenance and elaboration of the household paraphernalia; so that it is leisure only in the sense that little or no productive work is performed by this class, not in the sense that all appearance of labour is avoided by them. The duties performed by the lady, or by the household or domestic servants, are frequently arduous enough, and they are also frequently directed to ends which are considered extremely necessary to the comfort of the entire household. So far as these services conduce to the physical efficiency or comfort of the master or the rest of the household, they are to be accounted productive work. Only the residue of employment left after deduction of this effective work is to be classed as a performance of leisure.

出处: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/833
定位:Excerpt 40 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

无论哪个阶层、哪个阶段,贵妇和仆人的“有闲”与绅士本人的“有闲”不同:它表面上是一种辛苦的“职业”。它主要表现为精心伺候主人,或维护、添置家里各种摆设。所以它只是“不从事生产劳动”意义上的有闲,并不是完全避免劳动的样子。贵妇和仆人干的活常常很累,也常被认为对全家舒适很必要。只要这些服务真能增进主人或全家的身体舒适和效率,就算生产性劳动;扣掉这部分,剩下的才算“有闲”表演。换句话说,很多家务和伺候,实用部分之外,还有炫耀部分。

上下文

凡勃伦区分“有闲”的不同类型,指出贵妇和仆人的有闲其实包含大量辛苦服务,只有超出实用需要的部分才算炫耀性有闲。

今日一问

你做的家务或服务里,哪些是真需要,哪些只是做给别人看?

公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库