投资 · 西方古典

托斯丹·凡勃伦:有闲阶级论·摘录 74

托斯丹·凡勃伦《有闲阶级论》· The Theory of the Leisure Class · 投资

It is to be added that a large share of those features of consumable goods which figure in popular apprehension as marks of serviceability, and to which reference is here had as elements of conspicuous waste, commend themselves to the consumer also on other grounds than that of expensiveness alone. They usually give evidence of skill and effective workmanship, even if they do not contribute to the substantial serviceability of the goods; and it is no doubt largely on some such ground that any particular mark of honorific serviceability first comes into vogue and afterward maintains its footing as a normal constituent element of the worth of an article. A display of efficient workmanship is pleasing simply as such, even where its remoter, for the time unconsidered, outcome is futile. There is a gratification of the artistic sense in the contemplation of skillful work. But it is also to be added that no such evidence of skillful workmanship, or of ingenious and effective adaptation of means to an end, will, in the long run, enjoy the approbation of the modern civilized consumer unless it has the sanction of the Canon of conspicuous waste.

出处: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/833
定位:Excerpt 74 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

商品上那些被大众当成“好用标志”的特征,很多其实是显眼浪费,但它们不只靠贵来打动人。它们常展示出精湛手艺和巧妙用心,哪怕对实际功能没帮助,也让人看着舒服。人们欣赏熟练工艺本身,就像看高手做事一样愉悦。不过,这种工艺展示若想长期被现代消费者认可,最终还得通过“显眼浪费”这一关:它必须同时显得值钱、有派头,否则光有技巧也站不住脚。

上下文

凡勃伦继续分析消费品的“荣誉性”特征,指出审美与炫耀如何交织。

今日一问

你欣赏一件物品时,是被它的手艺打动,还是被它暗示的价格和身份打动?

公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库