投资 · 西方古典

托斯丹·凡勃伦:有闲阶级论·摘录 79

托斯丹·凡勃伦《有闲阶级论》· The Theory of the Leisure Class · 投资

But the woman's apparel not only goes beyond that of the modern man in the degree in which it argues exemption from labor; it also adds a peculiar and highly characteristic feature which differs in kind from anything habitually practiced by the men. This feature is the class of contrivances of which the corset is the typical example. The corset is, in economic theory, substantially a mutilation, undergone for the purpose of lowering the subject's vitality and rendering her permanently and obviously unfit for work. It is true, the corset impairs the personal attractions of the wearer, but the loss suffered on that score is offset by the gain in reputability which comes of her visibly increased expensiveness and infirmity. It may broadly be set down that the womanliness of woman's apparel resolves itself, in point of substantial fact, into the more effective hindrance to useful exertion offered by the garments peculiar to women. This difference between masculine and feminine apparel is here simply pointed out as a characteristic feature. The ground of its occurrence will be discussed presently.

出处: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/833
定位:Excerpt 79 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

女人的衣服不仅比男人的衣服更明显地表明她不干活,还多出一种男人通常不用的特殊装置,紧身胸衣就是典型。凡勃伦说,从经济角度看,胸衣本质上是一种自残:它故意压低人的活力,让她长期、显眼地干不了活。胸衣确实损害了穿着者的个人魅力,但这点损失被另一种收益抵消了——她看起来更昂贵、更娇弱,因而更体面。所以,所谓女性服装的“女人味”,落到实处,就是更有效地妨碍她从事有用的劳动。这种男女服装的差别,本身就是一个特征,至于它为什么出现,作者说后面再谈。

上下文

凡勃伦《有闲阶级论》讨论服装如何成为炫耀性消费的载体,此段聚焦女性服饰中的紧身胸衣。

今日一问

今天有哪些“体面”的穿着或习惯,其实是在悄悄削弱你的行动能力?

公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库