事业 · 创业者自述

保罗·格雷厄姆:天才的车票理论·第4则

保罗·格雷厄姆《《天才的车票理论》》· The Bus Ticket Theory of Genius · 行动 · 领导 · 投资 · 认知

Newton's case, at least, suggests that the risk/reward rule holds here. He's famous for one particular obsession of his that turned out to be unprecedentedly fruitful: using math to describe the world. But he had two other obsessions, alchemy and theology, that seem to have been complete wastes of time. He ended up net ahead. His bet on what we now call physics paid off so well that it more than compensated for the other two. But were the other two necessary, in the sense that he had to take big risks to make such big discoveries? I don't know. Here's an even more alarming idea: might one make all bad bets? It probably happens quite often. But we don't know how often, because these people don't become famous. It's not merely that the returns from following a path are hard to predict.

出处: https://paulgraham.com/genius.html
定位:Essay, additional excerpt 4 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

至少牛顿的例子表明,风险与回报的规则在这里成立。他有一个痴迷后来证明空前多产:用数学描述世界。但他还有两个痴迷——炼金术和神学——似乎完全浪费时间。他最终净赚了:押注物理的回报如此之大,足以补偿另外两个。但另外两个是否必要,即他是否必须冒大风险才能做出大发现?我不知道。更令人不安的想法是:会不会有人所有赌注都押错?这很可能经常发生,但我们不知道频率,因为这些人不会出名。问题不只是跟随一条路的回报难以预测。

上下文

格雷厄姆以牛顿的炼金术和神学研究为例,讨论痴迷的风险与回报,并指出失败者往往不可见。

今日一问

你愿意为可能的大发现承担几次看似浪费时间的探索吗?如何控制风险?

公开随笔;仅摘录并链接作者官网原文,不托管全文。

本文本版权仍存续,此处仅为短摘录;完整原文请访问上方官方链接。 版权

← 返回原文库