事业 · 创业者自述

保罗·格雷厄姆:好的写作·第6则

保罗·格雷厄姆《《好的写作》》· Good Writing · 领导 · 认知 · 哲学 · 心性

If for some bizarre reason the number of jobs in a country were fixed, then immigrants really would be taking our jobs. So it's not quite right to say that better sounding writing is more likely to be true. Better sounding writing is more likely to be internally consistent. If the writer is honest, internal consistency and truth converge. But while we can't safely conclude that beautiful writing is true, it's usually safe to conclude the converse: something that seems clumsily written will usually have gotten the ideas wrong too. Indeed, the two senses of good writing are more like two ends of the same thing. The connection between them is not a rigid one; the goodness of good writing is not a rod but a rope, with multiple overlapping connections running through it.

出处: https://paulgraham.com/goodwriting.html
定位:Essay, additional excerpt 6 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

如果一国的就业岗位数量固定,移民确实会抢走工作。但岗位数并非固定,所以不能说“好听的文字更可能真实”。更准确地说,好听的文字更可能内部一致。如果作者诚实,内部一致就会趋近真实。虽然不能断定美文即真理,但通常可以反推:写得笨拙的文章,思想多半也有问题。好写作的两种含义(好听与正确)更像同一事物的两端,连接不是刚性的,而像一根绳子,由多股重叠的线索交织而成。所以,追求好文笔,也是在追求思想的一致与清晰。

上下文

格雷厄姆用移民与岗位的类比,说明好文笔与真实性之间是间接关系,但笨拙的文字往往暴露思想混乱。

今日一问

你能否找一篇你觉得写得笨拙的文章,分析它的思想是否也有不清楚的地方?

公开随笔;仅摘录并链接作者官网原文,不托管全文。

本文本版权仍存续,此处仅为短摘录;完整原文请访问上方官方链接。 版权

← 返回原文库