Investing · Western classics
Thorstein Veblen:The Theory of the Leisure Class, Excerpt 4
Thorstein Veblen《The Theory of the Leisure Class》· The Theory of the Leisure Class · Investing
This distinction has but little obvious significance in a modern industrial community, and it has, therefore, received but slight attention at the hands of economic writers. When viewed in the light of that modern common sense which has guided economic discussion, it seems formal and insubstantial. But it persists with great tenacity as a commonplace preconception even in modern life, as is shown, for instance, by our habitual aversion to menial employments. It is a distinction of a personal kind--of superiority and inferiority. In the earlier stages of culture, when the personal force of the individual counted more immediately and obviously in shaping the course of events, the element of exploit counted for more in the everyday scheme of life. Interest centred about this fact to a greater degree. Consequently a distinction proceeding on this ground seemed more imperative and more definitive then than is the case to-day. As a fact in the sequence of development, therefore, the distinction is a substantial one and rests on sufficiently valid and cogent grounds.
Source:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/833
Locator:Excerpt 4 · Verified:2026-10-19 · Verification:Short excerpt
Today's question
Does this passage change one judgment about money or risk today?
公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。
Your email
Used only to send Originals. No ads, no list selling.
This text is in the public domain. The edition and source link are above. Copyright