投资 · 西方古典

大卫·李嘉图:政治经济学及赋税原理·摘录 313

大卫·李嘉图《政治经济学及赋税原理》· On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation · 投资

"About ninety-six thousand hogsheads of tobacco are annually purchased with a part of the surplus produce of British industry. But the demand of Great Britain does not require, perhaps, more than fourteen thousand. If the remaining eighty-two thousand, therefore, could not be sent abroad _and exchanged for something more in demand at home_, the importation of them would cease immediately, _and with it the productive labour of all the inhabitants of Great Britain, who are at present employed in preparing the goods with which these eighty-two thousand hogsheads are annually purchased_." But could not this portion of the productive labour of Great Britain be employed in preparing some other sort of goods, with which something more in demand at home might be purchased? And if it could not, might we not employ this productive labour, though with less advantage, in making those goods in demand at home, or at least some substitute for them? If we wanted velvets, might we not attempt to make velvets; and if we could not succeed, might we not make more cloth, or some other object desirable to us?

出处: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/33310
定位:Excerpt 313 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

核心是:贸易中断不会让英国的生产劳动消失,只会促使其转向。原文假设英国每年用工业剩余产品购买约9.6万桶烟草,但国内只需1.4万桶,其余8.2万桶若不能换回国内更需要的商品,进口就会停止,相关劳动也会闲置。但李嘉图反问:这些劳动难道不能改做其他商品,用来交换国内更需要的东西吗?即使不能,也可以尝试生产替代品,比如做不了天鹅绒就多做布匹。所以关键不是保住某个行业,而是让劳动和资本自由寻找新用途,政府不必因贸易中断而恐慌。

上下文

李嘉图《政治经济学及赋税原理》第十九章《论商业的突然变化》,批评亚当·斯密关于贸易中断导致劳动闲置的观点。

今日一问

当某个行业受冲击时,你能否想到至少一种资源转用的可能,而不是只看到损失?

公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库