投资 · 西方古典

托斯丹·凡勃伦:有闲阶级论·摘录 60

托斯丹·凡勃伦《有闲阶级论》· The Theory of the Leisure Class · 投资

Similarly it is felt--and the sentiment is acted upon--that the priestly servitors of the divinity should not engage in industrially productive work; that work of any kind--any employment which is of tangible human use--must not be carried on in the divine presence, or within the precincts of the sanctuary; that whoever comes into the presence should come cleansed of all profane industrial features in his apparel or person, and should come clad in garments of more than everyday expensiveness; that on holidays set apart in honor of or for communion with the divinity no work that is of human use should be performed by any one. Even the remoter, lay dependents should render a vicarious leisure to the extent of one day in seven. In all these deliverances of men's uninstructed sense of what is fit and proper in devout observance and in the relations of the divinity, the effectual presence of the canons of pecuniary reputability is obvious enough, whether these canons have had their effect on the devout judgment in this respect immediately or at the second remove.

出处: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/833
定位:Excerpt 60 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

同样,人们觉得并且照做:神的祭司仆役不应从事生产性劳动;任何有实际人类用途的工作都不能在神面前或圣所范围内进行;来见神的人要洗净一切世俗工业痕迹,穿得比日常更昂贵;在敬神或与神交流的节日,任何人都不该做有人类用途的工作。连较远的平信徒依赖者也要每周替神守一天代理闲暇。这些未经教导的合宜感,背后明显有金钱荣誉准则在起作用,不管它是直接还是间接影响虔诚判断。

上下文

凡勃伦《有闲阶级论》以宗教节庆和祭司禁做工为例,说明金钱荣誉准则如何塑造虔诚观念。

今日一问

你遵守的哪些“神圣”规矩,其实只是金钱体面准则的翻版?

公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库