投资 · 西方古典

托斯丹·凡勃伦:有闲阶级论·摘录 65

托斯丹·凡勃伦《有闲阶级论》· The Theory of the Leisure Class · 投资

Public parks of course fall in the same category with the lawn; they too, at their best, are imitations of the pasture. Such a park is of course best kept by grazing, and the cattle on the grass are themselves no mean addition to the beauty of the thing, as need scarcely be insisted on with anyone who has once seen a well-kept pasture. But it is worth noting, as an expression of the pecuniary element in popular taste, that such a method of keeping public grounds is seldom resorted to. The best that is done by skilled workmen under the supervision of a trained keeper is a more or less close imitation of a pasture, but the result invariably falls somewhat short of the artistic effect of grazing. But to the average popular apprehension a herd of cattle so pointedly suggests thrift and usefulness that their presence in the public pleasure ground would be intolerably cheap. This method of keeping grounds is comparatively inexpensive, therefore it is indecorous.

出处: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/833
定位:Excerpt 65 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

凡勃伦说,公共公园和草坪一样,最好的状态是模仿牧场,放牧既能维护草地,牛群本身也增添美感。但现实中很少这样做,因为牛群太直接地让人联想到节俭和实用,在公共游乐场出现会显得“廉价”。于是人们宁愿花大钱请工人修剪出仿牧场的效果,也不愿用真正省钱又自然的放牧方式。这说明金钱体面标准压倒了真正的实用和美感。

上下文

凡勃伦以公共公园的维护方式为例,说明金钱体面标准如何排斥真正实用且美观的做法。

今日一问

你所在的城市公共空间,是否也有为了“体面”而放弃更实用、更自然方案的现象?

公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库