投资 · 西方古典

托斯丹·凡勃伦:有闲阶级论·摘录 76

托斯丹·凡勃伦《有闲阶级论》· The Theory of the Leisure Class · 投资

As has already been pointed out, the cheap, and therefore indecorous, articles of daily consumption in modern industrial communities are commonly machine products; and the generic feature of the physiognomy of machine-made goods as compared with the hand-wrought article is their greater perfection in workmanship and greater accuracy in the detail execution of the design. Hence it comes about that the visible imperfections of the hand-wrought goods, being honorific, are accounted marks of superiority in point of beauty, or serviceability, or both. Hence has arisen that exaltation of the defective, of which John Ruskin and William Morris were such eager spokesmen in their time; and on this ground their propaganda of crudity and wasted effort has been taken up and carried forward since their time. And hence also the propaganda for a return to handicraft and household industry. So much of the work and speculations of this group of men as fairly comes under the characterization here given would have been impossible at a time when the visibly more perfect goods were not the cheaper.

出处: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/833
定位:Excerpt 76 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

现代工业社会里,便宜日用品多是机器造,机器货的普遍特点就是做工更精、细节更准。于是手工货那些看得见的瑕疵,反倒成了荣誉标记,被说成更美或更好用。这就催生了“推崇缺陷”的风气,罗斯金和莫里斯当年大力鼓吹,后来还延续成回归手工和家庭工业的运动。这种思潮能出现,前提是机器货更完美却更便宜;若完美的东西不便宜,这套说法就站不住脚。

上下文

凡勃伦点评罗斯金、莫里斯等人推崇手工、贬低机器产品的审美运动,揭示其经济根源。

今日一问

当你追捧“手工瑕疵”时,是在追求真实,还是在追求一种更贵的身份符号?

公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库