事业 · 创业者自述
保罗·格雷厄姆：好的写作·第5则
保罗·格雷厄姆《《好的写作》》· Good Writing · 领导 · 认知 · 行动
But other times they're more subtle, and you need longer, more complicated sentences to tease out all the implications. An essay is a cleaned up train of thought, in the same way dialogue is cleaned up conversation, and a train of thought has a natural rhythm. So when an essay sounds good, it's not merely because it has a pleasing rhythm, but because it has its natural one. Which means you can use getting the rhythm right as a heuristic for getting the ideas right. And not just in principle: good writers do both simultaneously as a matter of course. Often I don't even distinguish between the two problems. I just think Ugh, this doesn't sound right; what do I mean to say here?
出处：
https://paulgraham.com/goodwriting.html
定位：Essay, additional excerpt 5 · 核对日期：2026-10-19 · 核验：短摘录
白话
有时思想微妙，需要更长、更复杂的句子来展开所有含义。文章是整理过的思路，就像对话是整理过的交谈，而思路有自然的节奏。所以，文章好听不仅因为节奏悦耳，更因为节奏自然。这意味着，你可以把“节奏对不对”当作检验“思想对不对”的捷径。好作家通常同时处理这两个问题，作者自己甚至不区分它们，只觉得“这读起来不对，我到底想说什么？”所以，当你觉得句子别扭时，别只改表面，要追问背后的思想是否清晰。
上下文
格雷厄姆在《好写作》中说明，文章的节奏应反映思路的自然流动，修改节奏就是修改思想。
今日一问
当你觉得某句话读起来不顺时，是否会停下来问自己：我到底想表达什么？
公开随笔；仅摘录并链接作者官网原文，不托管全文。
你的邮箱
只用于发送原典。不发广告，不卖名单。
本文本版权仍存续，此处仅为短摘录；完整原文请访问上方官方链接。 版权