Sun, May 30, 2027

But though the whole expense of maintaining the fixed capital is thus necessarily excluded from the neat revenue of the society, it is not the same case with that of maintaining the circulating capital. Of the four parts of which this latter capital is composed, money, provisions, materials, and finished work, the three last, it has already been observed, are regularly withdrawn from it, and placed either in the fixed capital of the society, or in their stock reserved for immediate consumption. Whatever portion of those consumable goods is not employed in maintaining the former, goes all to the latter, and makes a part of the neat revenue of the society. The maintenance of those three parts of the circulating capital, therefore, withdraws no portion of the annual produce from the neat revenue of the society, besides what is necessary for maintaining the fixed capital.

Source： https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3300
Book II, Chapter II, paragraph 717

This is a direct reading: the original and source are kept; commentary will be added later.

出生入死。 生之徒，十有三；死之徒，十有三；人之生，動之死地，亦十有三。夫何故？以其生生之厚。蓋聞善攝生者，陸行不遇兕虎，入軍不被甲兵；兕無所投其角，虎無所措其爪，兵無所容其刃。夫何故？以其無死地。

Source： https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E9%81%93%E5%BE%B7%E7%B6%93_%28%E7%8E%8B%E5%BC%BC%E6%9C%AC%29
王弼本·五十章

This is a direct reading: the original and source are kept; commentary will be added later.

Secondly, the wages of labour do not, in Great Britain, fluctuate with the price of provisions. These vary everywhere from year to year, frequently from month to month. But in many places, the money price of labour remains uniformly the same, sometimes for half a century together. If, in these places, therefore, the labouring poor can maintain their families in dear years, they must be at their ease in times of moderate plenty, and in affluence in those of extraordinary cheapness. The high price of provisions during these ten years past, has not, in many parts of the kingdom, been accompanied with any sensible rise in the money price of labour. It has, indeed, in some; owing, probably, more to the increase of the demand for labour, than to that of the price of provisions.

Source： https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3300
Book I, Chapter VIII, paragraph 209

This is a direct reading: the original and source are kept; commentary will be added later.

子夏之門人，問「交」於子張。子張曰：「子夏云何？」對曰：「子夏曰：『可者與之，其不可者拒之。』」子張曰：「異乎吾所聞；『君子尊賢而容眾，嘉善而矜不能。』我之大賢與，於人何所不容？我之不賢與，人將拒我，如之何其拒人也？」

Source： https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E8%AB%96%E8%AA%9E/%E5%AD%90%E5%BC%B5%E7%AC%AC%E5%8D%81%E4%B9%9D
子張第十九·十九之三

This is a direct reading: the original and source are kept; commentary will be added later.

In the hearing of the Industrial Commission in 1899, I then said that if I were to suggest any legislation regarding industrial combinations it would be: First, Federal legislation under which corporations may be created and regulated, if that be possible. Second, in lieu thereof, state legislation as nearly uniform as possible, encouraging combinations of persons and capital for the purpose of carrying on industries, but permitting state supervision, not of a character to hamper industries, but sufficient to prevent frauds upon the public. I still feel as I did in 1899.

Source： https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/17090
Chapter III, excerpt 62

This is a direct reading: the original and source are kept; commentary will be added later.