投资 · 西方古典
大卫·李嘉图:政治经济学及赋税原理·摘录 325
大卫·李嘉图《政治经济学及赋税原理》· On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation · 投资
I cannot, however, but remark that, though Adam Smith's general doctrines correspond with this which I have just quoted, yet in one part of his work he appears to have given a correct account of the nature of value. "The proportion between the value of gold and silver, and that of goods of any other kind, _depends in all cases_," he says, "_upon the proportion between the quantity of labour which is necessary in order to bring a certain quantity of gold and silver to market, and that which is necessary to bring thither a certain quantity of any other sort of goods_." Does he not here fully acknowledge that if any increase takes place in the quantity of labour, required to bring one sort of goods to market, whilst no such increase takes place in bringing another sort thither, those goods will rise in relative value. If no more labour be required to bring cloth and gold to market, they will not vary in relative value, but if more labour be required to bring corn and shoes to market, will not corn and shoes rise in value relatively to cloth, and money made of gold?
出处:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/33310
定位:Excerpt 325 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录
白话
李嘉图指出,亚当·斯密虽然总体观点与他一致,但斯密在某一处其实正确说明了价值的性质:金银与商品的价值比例,取决于各自所需劳动量的比例。李嘉图反问:如果生产某一种商品所需的劳动增加,而另一种不变,那么前者的相对价值就会上升。例如,生产布和黄金的劳动不变,它们之间的相对价值就不变;但如果生产谷物和鞋的劳动增加,谷物和鞋相对于布和金币就会升值。核心意思是,商品价值取决于生产所需的劳动量,劳动量的变化会导致相对价值变化。
上下文
出自李嘉图《政治经济学及赋税原理》,他在讨论价值理论时引用并评论亚当·斯密的观点。
今日一问
你能否举一个生活中的例子,说明生产某物所需的劳动增加,会导致它相对于其他物品更值钱?
公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。
你的邮箱
只用于发送原典。不发广告,不卖名单。
本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权