投资 · 西方古典

托马斯·马尔萨斯:人口论·摘录 167

托马斯·马尔萨斯《人口论》· An Essay on the Principle of Population · 投资

Suppose that two hundred thousand men, who are now employed in producing manufactures that only tend to gratify the vanity of a few rich people, were to be employed upon some barren and uncultivated lands, and to produce only half the quantity of food that they themselves consumed; they would be still more productive labourers with regard to the state than they were before, though their labour, so far from affording a rent to a third person, would but half replace the provisions used in obtaining the produce. In their former employment they consumed a certain portion of the food of the country and left in return some silks and laces. In their latter employment they consumed the same quantity of food and left in return provision for a hundred thousand men. There can be little doubt which of the two legacies would be the most really beneficial to the country, and it will, I think, be allowed that the wealth which supported the two hundred thousand men while they were producing silks and laces would have been more usefully employed in supporting them while they were producing the additional quantity of food.

出处: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/4239
定位:Excerpt 167 · 核对日期:2026-10-19 · 核验:短摘录

白话

马尔萨斯假设:二十万人现在生产只满足少数富人虚荣的奢侈品,若改去开垦荒芜土地,只生产他们自己消耗食物的一半,他们对国家来说仍是更有生产力的劳动者。以前他们消耗食物,留下丝绸花边;现在消耗同样食物,却留下够十万人吃的粮食。显然,后一种遗产对国家更有利。支持他们生产丝绸花边的财富,若用于支持他们生产额外食物,会更有用。

上下文

马尔萨斯用假设例子说明生产性劳动与非生产性劳动的区别,强调食物生产的重要性。

今日一问

我们今天的劳动中,有多少是真正满足基本需求,多少只是满足虚荣?

公版作品;原文逐字取自 Project Gutenberg,仅摘录段落并附全书链接。

本文本为公版;底本与原文链接见上。 版权

← 返回原文库